logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013.5.9. 선고 2013두2266 판결
시정명령등취소청구의소
Cases

2013Du2266 Action for revocation, such as a corrective order

Plaintiff Appellant

1. An solar light industry corporation;

2. An interesting national life insurance company;

3. Korean Island Inc.

4. Trode crowdfunding companies;

5. Ethropid broadcasting for stock companies;

6. Ethbrode broadcasting of stock companies;

7. Tropid light broadcasting for stock companies;

8. Tropis Korea Co., Ltd.

9. Channels for stock companies;

Defendant Appellee

Fair Trade Commission

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu36106 Decided December 12, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

May 9, 2013

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the argument on the grounds of appeal is not acceptable or not to exclude the grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

May 9, 2013

Judges

Justices Kim Shin

Justices Min Il-young

Justices Lee In-bok

Justices Park Poe-young

arrow