beta
Cases
2012du7875 Action for revocation of a penalty surcharge order
Plaintiff Appellant
A’s receiver A’s receiver B, a rehabilitation debtor, a corporation’s taking over the lawsuit
Defendant Appellee
Fair Trade Commission
The judgment below
Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu17884 Decided February 8, 2012
Imposition of Judgment
July 12, 2012
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per
July 12, 2012
Judges
Justices Park Poe-young
Justices Shin Young-chul
Justices Min Il-young