Attached 1. The list of plaintiffs is as shown in the list of plaintiffs (Law Firm Young-soo, Attorney Kim Jin-young, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Republic of Korea (Government Law Firm Corporation, Attorneys Soh Ho-ho, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

December 10, 2014

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Gahap50177 Decided October 31, 2013

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, Plaintiffs 1, 2, 3, 4-B, 1, 4-C, 4-, 5, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 35, 37, 38, 39, 44, 47, 49, 47, 50, 51, 1, 27, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 68, 19, 47, 19, 28, 19, 36, 47, 47, 97, 57, 57, 67, 68, 67, 69, 67, 67, 68, 67, 67, 67, 696, 67, 7

A. Each of the lawsuits by Plaintiffs 68, 111, and 100 shall be dismissed.

B. The defendant's 1-A, 1-B, 1-C, 2, 4-A, 4-, 5, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 44, 46, 47, 48, 47, 52, 54, 57, 56, 57, 57, 67, 57, 67, 57, 57, 69, 67, 67, 97, 67, 97, 69, 19, 2, 30, 19, 2, 30-4, 15, 19, 2, 30-4, 19, 57, 56, 67, 69, and 57.

C. Plaintiffs 73, 1-A, 1-B, 1-1, 2, 3, 4-B, 4-C, 5, 7, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 37, 38, 39, 48, 49, 50, 51, 51, 51, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 68, 57, 57, 68, 97, 79, 78, 64, 19, 61, 63, 14, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 57, 6869, 78, 679, 78, 697,

D. Of the total litigation cost, the part incurred between Plaintiffs 45, 46, 47, 65, 6, 70, 123, 124, 132, and 73 and the Defendant is borne by the Defendant; the part incurred between Plaintiffs 1 and 73 is borne by the Plaintiffs 73, 2, 3, 4-A, 4-, 4-2, 4, 4-5, 23, 25, 25, 26, 27, 27, 28, 29, 37, 39, 45, 47, 57, 47, 57, 57, 57, 19, 57, 16, 57, 19, 57, 57, 19, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 335, 36, 37, 4, 48, 4

2. Plaintiffs 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 34, 40, 41, 42, 43, 58-A, 58-B, 58-C, 58-D, 58-E, 58-13, 61, 63, 64, 75, 76, 77, 78, 70, 81, 829, 19, 19, 41, 41, 34, 41, 34, 41, 43, 14, 43, 14, 14, 14, 34, 14, 14, 14, 19, 28-19, 29

3. Plaintiffs 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 34, 40, 41, 42, 43, 58-A, 58-B, 58-C, 58-Ra, 58-Ma, 58-Ma, 58-13, 41, 43, 41, 43, 14, 41, 43, 41, 62, 63, 64, 75, 76, 78, 70, 81, 81, 839, 19, 29, 148-14, 34, 13, 41, 14, and 54-14, 13, 1414.

4. The part concerning plaintiffs 58 of the first instance court's order in Paragraph 1 of Article 58-A, plaintiffs 58-B, 58-C, plaintiffs 58-D, 58-E, and 58-F was modified as follows.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 58-A 1,491,124 won, plaintiff 58-B, plaintiff 58-C, plaintiff 58-D, plaintiff 58-E, plaintiff 58-F each 994,082 won and each of the above amounts, 5% per annum from September 12, 2013 to October 31, 2013, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

5. The part against Plaintiffs 143-A, 143-B, 143-C, 143-D, 143-Ma, 143-E, and 143-F, among the part against Plaintiff 143 of the order of the first instance court, was modified as follows.

The Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff 143-A 1,253,061 won, Plaintiff 143-B, and Plaintiff 143-C 1,253,061 won, Plaintiff 143-D, Plaintiff 143-E, and Plaintiff 143-E, respectively, 4,385,714 won, and 20% interest per annum from September 12, 2013 to October 31, 2013, and from the following day to the date of full payment.

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 5% interest per annum from October 1, 1950 to the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment (the plaintiff has reduced its claim amount in the first instance).

2. Purport of appeal

Plaintiff: To modify the judgment of the first instance court as stated in the purport of the claim.

Defendant: The part of the judgment of the first instance court against Defendant is revoked, and all of the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the above revocation are dismissed.

1. Basic facts

This Court's explanation is identical to the part 1) of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for a change to the inheritance relationship and the cited amount in Section 6 of Section 5 of the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, this Court shall accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as it is, in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination as to the lawfulness of the instant lawsuit and the Defendant’s defense prior to the merits

First, in light of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the legitimacy of the lawsuits filed by Plaintiffs 68, 201 (Death on December 18, 201), 111 (Death on January 8, 201), and 100 (Death on April 25, 1996), Plaintiffs 16, 17-2, and 120 (Death on April 25, 1996), the above Plaintiffs can be acknowledged as having died prior to the filing date of the lawsuit of this case (the date of January 13, 2012), and thus, the lawsuit of this case filed by the above Plaintiffs is unlawful.

On the other hand, the defendant defense that the lawsuit of this case, except for plaintiffs 68, 111, and 100, was filed by the attorney who had not lawfully granted the right of attorney from the plaintiffs. However, there is no circumstance to suspect that the delegation of the lawsuit of the plaintiffs submitted in this case was forged or otherwise not duly formed. The plaintiffs' legal representative is most parties to this case. The plaintiffs' legal representative submitted most copies of identification cards to explain the fact that he was granted the right of attorney (the copies of identification cards of the plaintiffs except plaintiffs 16, 123, and 124 among the remaining plaintiffs were submitted). Thus, the plaintiffs' legal representative is deemed to have been granted the right of attorney from the plaintiffs. Thus, there is no reason for the defendant's prior defense on the merits.

3. Occurrence of liability for damages;

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the “the occurrence of liability for damages” of the first instance court’s reasoning is as stated in Section 2 of the same Article; and (b) therefore, (c) the same is cited by the main text of Article 420

4. Determination on the statute of limitations defense

The court's explanation on this part is identical to the part concerning "the defendant's defense of extinctive prescription" in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, as stated in the part concerning "the defendant's defense of extinctive prescription" in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

5. Scope of liability for damages

The court's reasoning for this part is as follows: (a) the part stated in Forms 18, 4, and 5 of the first instance court's decision is as follows: (b) "When the process of calculating the inheritance relation and the cited amount is conducted on the basis of the objection, the amount of damages of the plaintiffs shall be as stated in the separate sheet No. 2." (c) The defendant "B" against the plaintiffs other than plaintiffs 68, 11, 100, and 73 of the first instance court's decision is as stated in the separate sheet No. 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and therefore, (d) the remaining plaintiffs except plaintiffs 68, 11, 100, and 73 of the first instance court's decision is as stated in the separate sheet No. 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

6. Conclusion

그렇다면, 원고 68, 원고 111, 원고 100의 소는 부적법하여 이를 각하하고, 원고 45, 원고 46, 원고 47, 원고 65, 원고 66, 원고 70, 원고 122, 원고 123, 원고 124, 원고 132의 청구는 이유가 있어 이를 인용하며, 원고 1-가, 원고 1-나, 원고 1-다, 원고 2, 원고 3, 원고 4-가, 원고 4-나, 원고 4-다, 원고 4-라, 원고 5, 원고 7, 원고 22, 원고 23, 원고 25, 원고 26, 원고 27, 원고 28, 원고 29, 원고 30, 원고 31, 원고 32, 원고 33, 원고 35, 원고 36, 원고 37, 원고 38, 원고 39, 원고 44, 원고 48, 원고 49, 원고 50, 원고 51, 원고 52, 원고 53, 원고 54, 원고 55, 원고 56, 원고 57, 원고 59, 원고 67, 원고 69, 원고 71, 원고 72, 원고 74, 원고 84, 원고 85, 원고 86, 원고 87, 원고 88, 원고 89, 원고 90, 원고 91, 원고 94, 원고 95, 원고 96, 원고 97, 원고 98, 원고 101, 원고 102, 원고 103, 원고 104, 원고 110, 원고 113, 원고 114, 원고 115-가, 원고 115-나, 원고 115-다, 원고 115-라, 원고 116, 원고 117, 원고 125, 원고 126-가, 원고 126-나, 원고 127, 원고 128, 원고 129, 원고 130, 원고 131, 원고 133, 원고 135, 원고 136, 원고 140, 원고 146, 원고 147의 청구는 위 인정범위 내에서 이유가 있어 이를 인용하고, 위 원고들의 나머지 청구 및 원고 73의 청구는 이유가 없어 이를 각 기각할 것인바, 제1심 판결 중 원고 1(소송수계인 원고 1-가, 원고 1-나, 원고 1-다), 원고 2, 원고 3, 원고 4-가, 원고 4-나, 원고 4-다, 원고 4-라, 원고 5, 원고 7, 원고 22, 원고 23, 원고 25, 원고 26, 원고 27, 원고 28, 원고 29, 원고 30, 원고 31, 원고 32, 원고 33, 원고 35, 원고 36, 원고 37, 원고 38, 원고 39, 원고 44, 원고 45, 원고 46, 원고 47, 원고 48, 원고 49, 원고 50, 원고 51, 원고 52, 원고 53, 원고 54, 원고 55, 원고 56, 원고 57, 원고 59, 원고 65, 원고 66, 원고 67, 원고 68, 원고 69, 원고 70, 원고 71, 원고 72, 원고 73, 원고 74, 원고 84, 원고 85, 원고 86, 원고 87, 원고 88, 원고 89, 원고 90, 원고 91, 원고 93(소송수계인 원고 94, 원고 95, 원고 96, 원고 97, 원고 98), 원고 94, 원고 95, 원고 96, 원고 97, 원고 98, 원고 100, 원고 101, 원고 102, 원고 103, 원고 104, 원고 110, 원고 111, 원고 113, 원고 114, 원고 115(소송수계인 원고 115-가, 원고 115-나, 원고 115-다, 원고 115-라), 원고 116, 원고 117, 원고 122, 원고 123, 원고 124, 원고 125, 원고 126(소송수계인 원고 126-가, 원고 126-나), 원고 127, 원고 128, 원고 129, 원고 130, 원고 131, 원고 132, 원고 133, 원고 135, 원고 136, 원고 140, 원고 146, 원고 147에 대한 부분은 이와 결론을 일부 달리하여 부당하므로 주문 제1항과 같이 제1심 판결을 변경하고, 제1심 판결 중 원고 6, 원고 8, 원고 9, 원고 10, 원고 11, 원고 12, 원고 13, 원고 14, 원고 15, 원고 16, 원고 17, 원고 18, 원고 19, 원고 20, 원고 21, 원고 24, 원고 34, 원고 40, 원고 41, 원고 42, 원고 43, 원고 60, 원고 61, 원고 62, 원고 63, 원고 64, 원고 75, 원고 76, 원고 77, 원고 78, 원고 79, 원고 80, 원고 81, 원고 82, 원고 83, 원고 92, 원고 99, 원고 105, 원고 106, 원고 107, 원고 108, 원고 109, 원고 112, 원고 118, 원고 119, 원고 120, 원고 121, 원고 134, 원고 137, 원고 138, 원고 139, 원고 141, 원고 142, 원고 144, 원고 145, 원고 143, 원고 58에 대한 부분은 정당하므로, 원고 6, 원고 8, 원고 9, 원고 10, 원고 11, 원고 12, 원고 13, 원고 14, 원고 15, 원고 16, 원고 17, 원고 18, 원고 19, 원고 20, 원고 21, 원고 24, 원고 34, 원고 40, 원고 41, 원고 42, 원고 43, 원고 58-가, 원고 58-나, 원고 58-다, 원고 58-라, 원고 58-마, 원고 58-바, 원고 60, 원고 61, 원고 62, 원고 63, 원고 64, 원고 75, 원고 76, 원고 77, 원고 78, 원고 79, 원고 80, 원고 81, 원고 82, 원고 83, 원고 92, 원고 99, 원고 105, 원고 106, 원고 107, 원고 108, 원고 109, 원고 112, 원고 118, 원고 119, 원고 120, 원고 121, 원고 134, 원고 137, 원고 138, 원고 139, 원고 141, 원고 142, 원고 144, 원고 145, 원고 143-가, 원고 143-나, 원고 143-다, 원고 143-라, 원고 143-마, 원고 143-바, 원고 143-사의 항소 및 위 원고들에 대한 피고의 항소를 모두 기각하되, 다만 원고 58의 소송수계인들의 수계에 따라 제1심 판결 중 원고 58에 대한 부분을 주문 제4항과 같이, 원고 143의 소송수계인들의 수계에 따라 제1심 판결 중 원고 143에 대한 부분을 주문 제5항과 같이 각 변경하기로 하여, 주문과 같이 판결한다.

[Attachment]

Judges Kim Wil (Presiding Judge)

Note 1) The part written from No. 8 to No. 5 of the judgment of the first instance court is the part written from No. 2 to No. 8.

Note 2) The part written from 5th to 13th 9th 20th 5th 5th 5th 5th 200.

Note 3) The part written from No. 10 to No. 15 of the first instance judgment is the part written from No. 13 to No. 17.

Note 4) The part written from No. 16 to No. 18 of the first instance court ruling is the part written from No. 17 to No. 18.