logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.20 2013고단6662
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013Kadan662] The Defendant, from April 8, 2009 to May 31, 2010, has been engaged in the sale and delivery business of D, a victim of Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul, as a member of D’s sales and delivery business.

1. On May 12, 2009, the Defendant embezzled the proceeds from the sale of happy fish, which was kept in custody for the victim by collecting 600,000 won from F located in Daejeon Seo-gu E, and used the proceeds for personal purposes, such as living expenses, in mind at the daily center in Incheon Si around that time.

From around that time to May 3, 2010, the Defendant used the total sum of KRW 35,702,50,000, which was kept in business for the victim, for the purpose of using the same method at Daejeon, such as living expenses, etc., as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table (1).

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim who was under custody in the course of business.

2. On November 5, 2009, the Defendant, in the middle-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government H bonded warehouse, supplied from Jung-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, to the JJ located in Jung-gu, and then released 10kg of active fish equivalent to KRW 2.40,00,00 in the market price, and used it for personal purposes such as selling it back to the victim around that time.

From around that time to May 20, 2010, the Defendant consumed 35,162,860 g of the market value of 35,162,860 g, which was in custody for the victim by the same method over a total of 59 times, such as the list of crimes (2) as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes (B), with the mind of selling it for the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim who was under custody in the course of business.

[2013 Highest 6845] The Defendant is a person in charge of the duties of supplying and collecting the price from the “M” operated by the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City K Victim L and the “P” operated by the NvictimO in Kimpo-si.

1. The Defendant’s occupational embezzlement against the victim L is on January 2013.

arrow