logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2009. 10. 15. 선고 2009두12815 판결
직계존비속에게 양도한 주택을 양수인이 증여받은 것으로 추정한 처분의 당부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2008Guhap17646 ( October 02, 2008)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2007west2813 (Law No. 29, 2008)

Title

propriety of the disposition by which the transferee presumed that the transferred house was donated to his lineal ascendant or descendant

Summary

In light of the content of the housing sales contract that is transferred to a lineal ascendant or descendant, there is no economic rationality between the parties to the general transaction, and there is a lack of clear explanation on the acquisition fund by the transferee, the disposition presumed to have been donated is legitimate.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow