logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2009. 12. 24. 선고 2009두15456 판결
신고납세제도 하에서 과세관청의 조사권은 2차적이므로 납세자의 행위대로 부과처분하는 것은 정당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2009Nu964 ( August 20, 2009)

Case Number of the previous trial

National High Court 2005 Jeon0688 (Law No. 766, 2005)

Title

Under the reporting tax payment system, the tax authority's authority to investigate is the second and second, so it is legitimate to impose tax as taxpayer's act.

Summary

In order to avoid compulsory execution, the title trust and related contract are invalid only when the title trust and related contract are imposed in accordance with the self-supply regulations, while filing a report on the closure of the business and paying the sales tax after receiving the ownership of the real estate as a result of the transfer of the business registration and receiving the refund of the input tax after receiving the registration of the business.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Trial Procedure, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow