Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant damaged property: (a) within the office of the office of the office of the E- Incheon Branch, Inc., Ltd., in which D, the wife located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, manages the business of Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon, from around 13:00 on May 17, 2016 to around 14:00, the Defendant was found at the Fpung Business Office operated by the Defendant during working

For the reason that the Defendant was unable to answer column, the Defendant issued a waiting order to D on the ground that he was the actual operator of the above E, but found it on the ground that he was going to work in the office continuously without complying with this, and destroyed and damaged the number of computers owned by the victim E (or equivalent to the market price of KRW 1,320,000), facsimile one (or equivalent to the market price of KRW 470,000), one hot water meter (or equivalent to the market price of KRW 200,000), two Internet telephone lines (or equivalent to the market price of KRW 440,000), one air conditioner (or equivalent to KRW 120,000), two chairs (or equivalent to the market price of KRW 180,00) (or equivalent to the market price of KRW 180,00).

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant collected office supplies, etc. at the same time as above at the same place as above, and the customers interfered with the business of the victim D (the 50-year old-old-age-old-age-old-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-old-age-old-age-old-out-out-out-out-out-out-of

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and criminal images of damage;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for negligence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel concerning the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order issued a waiting victim as the representative director of the corporation E, and the victim's office.