A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a “C” inspector belonging to the Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu.

On October 20, 2016, at around 15:05, the Defendant, within the office of Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu 103, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, where the corrosion for departure from the port of this case was small, called the C office with a good objection, and called the C office with F, who is the head of the office at the place of the office, but interviewed with F, who was an infinite; however, the Defendant would retire from the office with an infinite to the victim G (e.g., 30 years of age) who was in the above C office.

However, on the ground that the victim's identity is the victim, the victim "the 6th head of the weather is prior to him, and is not superior at all at the same time," and assault the victim's face by breaking balthing balth and drinking balth of the victim's balth, which is a dangerous object (f1cm, 21cm in width, 21cm in height, 21.5cm in height) and balth of the victim's shoulder balth, which was above the victim's shoulder, the victim's shoulder balth of the above office's market price of KRW 380,00,00 in amount to KRW 20 computer monitoring unit of KRW 380,00 and market price of KRW 20,00 in the above office's market price of KRW 26,300,000,000 in the market price of KRW 26,000,606.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles and damaged the victim's property worth 66,000 won at the market price owned by the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the police statement protocol to G;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)