logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.08.14 2019고단1084
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment of eight months, and by a fine of seven million won, respectively.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death, etc.) is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter cargo vehicles.

On December 13, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on December 17:50, 2018, and proceeded at the speed of about 60km from the jundong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-do-

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well well, and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected the defendant's fault to cross the road from the right side of the defendant's proceeding to the left side, and received the victim D (75 years old) who crosses the road from the defendant's proceeding to the left side.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim at the site by occupational negligence above.

(b) No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated C Poter freight cars which were not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1(a).

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a car in EKan-Pac.

On December 13, 2018, around 17:53 on December 13, 2018, the Defendant continued the place indicated in paragraph 1(a) from the border distance to the mix of ting Changstm along the speed of about 61km each hour.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front left and accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds as it is, the defendant D, which is used in one-lane due to the accident described in paragraph 1(a).

arrow