logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.05.02 2013고단207
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of two years and six months, respectively.

However, each of the defendants is against the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On January 7, 2013, the Defendant violated the Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated a G chip XG car that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front of the Korean currency bond located in the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Ulsan Metropolitan City.

B. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dok-gu) was driving the said vehicle at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 1, and was driving at the distance of the consul from the surface of the burg distance to the non-speed speed.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to safely proceed by accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and went beyond the road by shocking the victim H (34 years old) who crosses the road to the right side from the left side of the defendant's running direction by his negligence.

hereinafter referred to as "the primary accident".

In light of the aforementioned occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped the victim and escaped without taking measures such as aiding the victim, even though the victim suffered an injury, such as cutting the body of a dub in the treatment days.

2. Defendant B, on January 7, 2013, driving Ichip taxi as his duties, was driven at around 23:39, and the place indicated in paragraph (1) was driven at a speed of about 40 km from the projected distance to the surface of terminal company distance.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to safely proceed by accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim H which was in excess of one-lane due to the accident in paragraph 1(b) in the front direction of the defendant's proceeding by negligence while neglecting it.

arrow