logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.09.12 2017노1623
폭행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) was written by the Defendant in the emergency room of Amph C Hospital, as stated in the judgment of the court below, and the Defendant did not intend to assault the victim on the ground that the Defendant merely expressed a somewhat friendly attitude of the nursing private person working in the emergency room.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant, at the time, exercised the force of force by using the blood pressure gauge and the clibly measuring device storage on the victim’s horse dose and attitude toward the victim’s body, and by using the victim’s arms.

In light of the circumstances leading to the crime, the attitude of the assault, etc., the intent of the assault can also be recognized (such as the Defendant’s statement, that the blood pressure system was pushed down to the victim).

(1) On July 7, 2016, at around 20:10, the Defendant visited the C Hospital emergency room in order to receive Am-wave medical treatment. The waiting time for medical treatment was about one hour from the nurse, and the other hospital using the above hospital emergency vehicle was refused to transmit the vehicle, and the assessment of the victim was not good.

(2) The victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, had the defendant collected the blood pressure gauge and the blood pressure gauge custodian on his/her responsibility, and prevented the defendant from suffering from the blood pressure gauge.

The defendant statements that the injured person is demanding the defendant to sit immediately, and the defendant recognizes that he was closely involved in the blood pressure system and the blood pressure gauge storage.

③ At the time when the Defendant was subject to the blood pressure measurement from the injured party, the Defendant seems to have been extremely difficult at the distance between the Defendant and the injured party.

(4) On July 7, 2016, immediately after the occurrence of the instant case: 21:05:16 C hospital.

arrow