1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant shall include the list in paragraph (1) of the attached Table 4.

1. Reference fact 【Evidence】 Statements Nos. 1 through 5, 7 through 10, 13, 14, 21, 24, 27, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 7, and 8 (Evidence No. 1 through 5, 7, and 27 shall include the numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. The Plaintiff entered and graduated from C University psychological department in 1985, and was appointed as a full-time professor at D University psychological department in 2001. The Plaintiff conducted a study on the basis of the precautionary approach to “individual (child/Juvenile)-Family-School” from the time of attending a graduate school as the school psychological department. The doctor’s degree thesis (1998) is “I”. The content of the study is “I de-delivery model” among six (6) of the school psychological studies, which developed a genetic promotion program based on the preventive-promotion model and verified its effects. As such, the Plaintiff’s development of the program using risk factors and protection factors related to the prevention of adverse behavior and the promotion of healthy functions at the level of multi-story of “child/Juvenile-Family-School” among the research methods, the effect of which is measured by the research method is to measure the effects of the program by using the variables corresponding to those of “J”, “test ability to inspect the program, SPRRR system,” and “SRRRR system,” the examination method and evaluation method.

The social technology evaluation system is a multi-level evaluation scheme designed to evaluate one student himself/herself, his/her parents, and teachers at the same time, and was developed by Ma professor and N professor, a representative school psychologist of the United States. They were used. 2) The Defendant was admitted to, and graduated from, C University psychological department in 1983, and then, was appointed as a professor of the E University in 2004.

The defendant's detailed major is a counseling and psychology, and the master's degree thesis (1989) is K, and the doctor's degree thesis (1996) is "L" and the 5th published by 2002.