logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.23 2014고정1077
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Around March 2005, the Defendant entered a doctorate course at a graduate school of D University and obtained medical doctorate on February 20, 2009, and is currently working as C University medical administration and professor.

The Defendant passed a comprehensive examination on October 2, 2006 and completed the doctorate course on February 20, 2007, but did not obtain the degree immediately at that time, and the Defendant found E who is a professor at early 2008 and F who is a professor at an autopsy school, and requested the Defendant to provide convenience such as publication in two copies of the thesis, which is necessary for the doctor’s degree thesis examination, and the essay experiment necessary for the doctor’s degree examination.

Accordingly, E and F directed the K of the postmortem School Research Institute G to conduct an examination necessary for the thesis review, and F entered H’s medical doctor’s degree thesis in the school journal, the Defendant who did not have contributed to the thesis as a joint author and created the result of publication in this paper.

On October 2008, the Defendant: (a) obtained the results of experiments necessary for the preparation of a thesis from G and I; (b) drafted a thesis of “J” in the title; and (c) filed a request for a doctor’s degree thesis examination with D University graduate schools.

E, F, etc. participate as an examiner of the thesis review on the above thesis around December 2008. In fact, this paper is based on the draft of the paper used in G and I tested and arranged by G and I, who is the researcher of the autopsy school, and the draft of the paper used in the autopsy school, and thus, submitted a report of examination to the graduate school of D and D and the defendant submitted the report of examination to determine that the acquisition of a degree is "A" despite being aware that it is inappropriate to obtain a degree by the defendant, and the defendant obtained a doctor's degree in medical science on February 2009 with the approval of the graduate school of D and D and without knowledge of the fact.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the examination of the thesis and the conferment of degrees at D University graduate schools by fraudulent means in sequence with E, F, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1.F. E is for itself.

arrow