logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.09.22 2015고합281
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

A. On May 19, 2015, the Defendant threatened the victim E (year 71) at the home of the victim E (year 71) located in Seodaemun-si around May 19, 2015, with a view to committing a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc.) by resident support in the Daegu District Court on May 19, 2015 to the Defendant at the Daegu District Court on May 19, 2015, on the ground that the victim appeared as a witness of the prosecutor’s office and testified against the Defendant to give testimony unfavorable to the Defendant, such as a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc.).

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, expressed the attitude of threatening the victim to commit any harm to the victim for the purpose of retaliation against his testimony in relation to his criminal case trials.

B. At around 21:00 on June 4, 2015, the Defendant testified unfavorable to the Defendant’s house in the Defendant’s criminal trial as seen above before the Defendant’s house located in Yongsan City F, and the Defendant reported to 112 that the victim would have discovered the victim and threatened the victim, as described in the above paragraph (a), and was subject to investigation by the victim, as described in the said paragraph, on the ground that he reported to 112, the Defendant was frightened, and her desire to take about 20 minutes of the victim’s house located in the Defendant’s house located in the victim’s house located in the Defendant’s house, adjacent to the Defendant’s house, for about 20 minutes, and threatened the Defendant, “I will not frighten with the Defendant’s frighten with the Defendant’s house.”

Accordingly, the defendant testified in relation to his criminal case trials as above, and expressed his attitude that he would inflict any danger or injury on the victim for the purpose of retaliation against his criminal case investigations.

2. On January 4, 2014, the Defendant interfered with his/her business, within the “I pre-market” operated by the victim H located in G at door-si around 20:48, the Defendant changed the price of the cigarette to the Defendant who purchased tobacco.

arrow