A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2015, around 23:35, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported that a drunk person satisfed against students; (b) taken a bath to two high school students by a police box affiliated with the Sungdong Police Station Esatch, which called “I am, I am, I am sat, I am satfy”; and (c) prevented the Defendant, who satched the satch, satched the F’s body, satfling the satch, and sat down the F’s satch with his hand, and sat down the F’s satch.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the prevention of danger and the maintenance of order by F, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59(1) of the Act on Probation, Etc. [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor, 2 years of suspended execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor, and 2 years of suspended execution (see, e.g., the degree of the obstruction of performance of official duties in this case and the fact that