1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,130,532 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from May 4, 2017 to June 26, 2018, and the next day.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 6, 2014, the Defendant confirmed the advertisement of the Plaintiff’s 2008 Ecoos car owned by the Plaintiff on the website (hereinafter “instant vehicle”). On the advertisement, the instant vehicle was indicated to the effect that: (a) the instant vehicle was managed, managed, prevented, and maintained only as a net vehicle, and was well managed by the designated maintenance business establishment, and was stated to the effect that the instant vehicle was “the complete operation accident”.

On the following day, the Defendant agreed to purchase the instant vehicle at KRW 13,50,000 for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, and received the instant vehicle by paying KRW 1,254,540 for the registration tax and acquisition tax, KRW 204,50 for the registration agency fee, KRW 150,000 for the Plaintiff, and KRW 15,109,040 for the day.

B. On the following day of the delivery of the instant vehicle, the Defendant found out the failure or malfunction of the HID electric wheel, the Ballaster, and the driver’s seat in the instant vehicle, discovered gas leakage in the vehicle, exchanged wals wals turling, and discovered any defect in the part of the accelerator such as the driver’s seat and exchanged the parts.

On the 27th day of the same month, the plaintiff was asked to repair the plaintiff at around that time, taking into account the fact that 2 million won or more of the repair costs were found, but the plaintiff was required to repair the plaintiff by exchanging only the type of the type of the type of the type of the type of the type of the type of the type of the show.

Accordingly, on November 4, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the instant vehicle sales contract will be rescinded on the basis of the seller’s warranty liability.

C. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff claiming restitution and damages arising from the cancellation of the above contract.

(In the first instance court of the instant case, the Plaintiff recognized the termination of the contract by the Defendant, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 15,109,040 to the Defendant and damages for delay.