1. The defendant against the plaintiffs

(a)on delivery of one motor vehicle (e.g., color: Ma300), such as the attached motor vehicle indication;

(b) above;

1. Circumstances leading to the dispute of this case;

A. The defendant is a company that imports and sells BMW vehicles.

On March 28, 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a sales contract with the Defendant for the first vehicle for BMW (type GED, type 2014, color 1300) such as the attached car indication.

The sales amount was set at KRW 61,100,000.

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). B.

On April 1, 2014, the Plaintiffs paid the Defendant a down payment of KRW 1,00,000,000, and paid the remainder KRW 6,010,000 on April 24, 2014.

C. On April 16, 2014, Plaintiff A visited the Defendant’s substitute exhibition on the following day after hearing the horses that “one-day vehicle arrives” from the Defendant’s business employees, and visited the Defendant’s substitute exhibition. However, Plaintiff A told that “A” means that “the vehicle is not at issue in the vehicle ordered by the Plaintiff, on the wind that the two glasss of the vehicle being transported together while transporting the BM vehicle from the substitute exhibition site to the substitute exhibition site, she is out of the wind that the vehicle is being transported together (referring to the vehicle, the payment period of the vehicle to which the order was received is delayed and carried over to the borrowed end) and the vehicle cannot be handed over.”

Plaintiff

A made April 24, 2014 to receive vehicles. D.

Plaintiff

A On April 24, 2014, the Defendant received delivery from the Defendant of one of the Category BMW vehicle (automobile registration number D; hereinafter “instant vehicle”) of the same type as the attached vehicle indication (However, vehicle manufacturing year is 2014.).

The instant vehicle was registered in the name of the plaintiffs (50%).

E. On May 2014, in order to clean the instant vehicle, Plaintiff A found that the driver’s knife knife knife knife and knife knife knife knife knife between the driver’s knife and the meter’s board, and found the defects of low stife knife knife

F. On June 12, 2014, the Plaintiffs requested the Vehicle Technology Appraisal Center Co., Ltd. to identify the existence of the instant vehicle accident and the repair parts, and E, a vehicle engineer belonging to the said company, as follows.