(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2015가단6478

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2015가단6478

자동차소유권이전등록절차이행등

Text

1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The Defendant: (a) KRW 21,500,000 for the Plaintiff and its related thereto on January 31, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 27, 2014, the Defendant posted a notice on the bulletin board of “SKKkk’s”, a trading site on the Internet, stating that a vehicle listed in the separate list in the Plaintiff’s name (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) will be sold at KRW 27.2 million. On December 28, 2014, the Defendant is a person with no personal knowledge.

I would like to purchase the instant vehicle by bearing the costs and expenses with the endr working at the next secondhand trading store.

The defendant's residential parking lot, which is the place of promise, is to send a withstanding to be jointly purchased.

The purchase price shall be KRW 27,200,000 registered on the bulletin board by the Defendant, but the contract, in order to report the reduction of the purchase price due to tax issues, etc., agreed to sell the instant vehicle in the parking lot for the Defendant’s residence on December 29, 2014. (b) On December 28, 2014, the Plaintiff would sell the instant vehicle from a person who is unaware of name.

The instant vehicle, as a bad credit holder, was placed in the name of the Defendant.

The purchase price shall not be received as a passbook in the form of a passbook.

“A telephone was received.” C. On December 29, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant decided to sell the instant vehicle at the Defendant’s residential parking lot, which is the place of promise, and prepared a sales contract and signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendant. The sales contract stated that the sales amount was KRW 21.5 million in the sales contract, and the Defendant stated that “21.5 million shall be included in C Bank Account D.,” and the Defendant stated the aforementioned separate matters after signing the above sales contract. However, the Defendant asserted that “the non-member of the name shall not speak to the Plaintiff at KRW 27.5 million,” and the Defendant considered that “the Plaintiff was deposited to the non-member of the name, and the non-member of the name was paid to the Defendant.”

"A statement" is stated separately by an investigative agency, and is therefore stated in that part.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원강릉지원 2014.11.11 2014나489

-수원지방법원 2015.11.26 2015나23465

-수원지방법원 2014.04.24 2013가단103885

-대구지방법원 2021.03.25 2020고단5157

-청주지방법원 2019.02.21 2018나7062