1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The details and details of the disposition are small and medium enterprises established on March 27, 2007 and engaged in the manufacturing and wholesale and retail business of the main wholesale and retail business.

Pursuant to Articles 34(2) and 27(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Promotion of Purchase of Small and Medium Enterprise Products and Support for Development of Market Markets (hereinafter “Market Support Act”), the Defendant is an institution entrusted by the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration with the authority to verify direct production of small and medium enterprises, to investigate whether direct production is implemented, and to revoke the verification of direct production.

In 2014, the Plaintiff was issued a certificate of direct production confirmation from the Defendant to “product name” under Article 9(4) of the Act on the Development of Market Support from the Defendant, which was the “product name” of “product name”: Twn, Twn, Pwnk, Pwn-gu (except for household use), Pwn-si (except for household use), and the term of validity: January 11, 2005 to January 10, 2017; and production factory:

★ 유의사항 ② 생산설비의 임대, 매각 등으로 직접생산확인기준 미충족 시 증명서 반납 ③ 직접생산확인을 받은 공장의 이전 시 30일 이내 증명서 반납 위 직접생산확인증명서에는 아래와 같은 사항이 기재되어 있다.

On August 12, 2015, based on Article 11(1) of the Act on the Development of Market Support, the Defendant’s employee visited the second floor of the building B (hereinafter “second floor factory”) in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “the second floor factory”) on August 12, 2015 and confirmed that there was no cuter, cutr, cutr, and spacker from among production facilities, and the spacker was installed inside the first floor of the building B in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu (hereinafter “the first floor factory”).

On September 15, 2015, after prior notice and hearing procedures, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke direct production verification against the Plaintiff on the ground of “satisfys in compliance with the standards for direct production verification” pursuant to Article 11(2)2, (3), and (5)2 of the Act on the Development of Agricultural and Fishing Villages.