The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a small and medium enterprise that runs the business of manufacturing and installing telecommunication systems and main loan systems.

Pursuant to Article 34(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Purchase of Small and Medium Enterprise Products and the Support for Development of Market Support (hereinafter “Market Support Act”), and Article 27(1)2 and 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Promotion of Purchase of Small and Medium Enterprise Products and the Support for Development of Market Support (hereinafter “Enforcement Decree of the Market Support Act”), the Defendant is an institution entrusted by the Minister of SMEs and Startups with duties such as confirmation of direct production, revocation of direct production, and implementation of hearings

A detailed name number 2410168901 parking lot control device valid 2410168903 parking lot control device valid 2410168906 parking guide valid 2410168906 parking lot 2410168907 parking lot calculating machine valid 2410168909, which is valid for a vehicle breaker 2410168909, return of the main loan, peripheral devices, and other reasons (O. 15, 2019) (No. 15, 2019).

B. Pursuant to Article 9 of the Act on Support for Development of Agricultural and Fishery Markets, the Plaintiff obtained direct production confirmation from the Defendant regarding the following main loan products among competing products only between small and medium enterprises and small and medium enterprises pursuant to the term of validity from June 19, 2018 to June 18, 2020.

C. On April 7, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a C Contract with the Public Procurement Service (hereinafter “instant procurement contract”). Accordingly, on November 12, 2018, the Plaintiff supplied the pertinent product upon request from the D Research Institute for the divided delivery of five air-conditioners, five air-conditioners, one air-conditioners, two vehicle breakers, and the delivery period for the said product as of February 10, 2019.

(hereinafter “instant delivery”). D.

As a result of examining whether the Defendant violated direct production against the Plaintiff, it is found that the Plaintiff purchased and supplied Macon Transmitter and receiving machine from F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) during the instant supply process. On November 19, 2019, the Defendant was confirmed directly by the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 11(2)3, (3), and (5)3 of the Act on Support for Development of Agricultural and Fishing Villages.