The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, two years of probation, and eight hours of community service order) is too unreasonable. However, the instant obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment as an act impeding the legitimate exercise of public authority and undermining the function of the State’s legal order. In light of the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, including the fact that the instant crime is not good in light of the details and method of the crime, place of the crime, etc., and that the Defendant has a very large number of criminal records of violence, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.