1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) indicated the attached Form 4, 5, 6, 7, and 7, among the land size of 423 square meters in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Co., Ltd. to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. Basic facts

A. The spouse of the plaintiff related to the party is D (Death on December 13, 2006) and D's reference is F.

The spouse of the defendant is G (Death on February 15, 2016) and G is H(Death on July 25, 1996) and H(Death on July 25, 1996).

F and I refer to F are J.

B. The ownership of 423 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul-do, and 423 square meters in size (hereinafter “instant land”).

On June 3, 1938, the registration of ownership preservation was completed under the name of J on the same day, and thereafter the registration of ownership transfer was completed to I on the same day. On June 18, 1993, H completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land of this case as a result of sale from I on December 30, 1982. 2) H divided the land of this case into K on August 11, 1993.

3) AH died on July 25, 1996. G registered the instant land in installments on March 9, 2004. On the same day, G completed the registration of ownership transfer due to the inheritance by agreement division as to each of the instant land. G re-divided the K substitute 177 square meters into C major 246 square meters on June 4, 2015. G around February 15, 2016. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer due to inheritance by agreement division on the instant land on May 27, 2016.

C. (1) The land ownership relationship between E and the land of this case is 201 square meters inboard (B) connected each point of the attached Table 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 4 among the land of this case in the order of around 1930 (hereinafter “land in this case”).

2) On the ground, the lower court determined that the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the ground of the lower court’s judgment, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2) Since D’s construction, D’s inheritance of each of the instant buildings from D from D, owned the instant building up to now, and occupied the instant dispute land, which is its site.

On February 23, 2011, the Plaintiff completed registration of initial ownership relating to the instant building.

3. On the other hand, H around 1960 on the ground of the instant land.