1. The part against the Defendants in the judgment of the first instance is revoked, and all of the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants are dismissed.

2.

Basic Facts

The relationship between the Parties F (Death on June 12, 1957) and G (Death on October 5, 2010), had 62 South and North Korean children, such as South and North H (Death on June 5, 2002), South and North J (Death on February 2013), South and North J, South and North Ha, K, Ha, South and North Ma, the Plaintiff, etc.

B and Defendant C were legally married couple who completed the marriage report on February 17, 1984, and had four children, such as N,O, D, P, etc. However, unlike other siblingss after marriage, they were cultivated and living in the instant land, while supporting a mother-friendly G, who remains in high fluence, unlike other siblings.

The ownership transfer registration of the instant land was completed on November 3, 1971 due to sale and purchase on January 1, 1950 with respect to the instant land. On December 30, 1999, Plaintiff and B completed the registration of ownership transfer based on each of the instant land donations.

On October 14, 2010, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership by reason of each gift (hereinafter “instant gift”) with respect to one-six of the Plaintiff’s shares in the instant land to B and the Defendants.

The J, such as other land donated to Defendant C and B, completed the registration of transfer of ownership on January 28, 1997 with respect to Qua 26,841 square meters of land donated to B on the ground of donation.

G on November 11, 1998, he completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to the 2,545 square meters prior to Seosan-si R, Seosan-si.

H on November 8, 199, completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of donation with respect to the 486 square meters in Seosan City, Seosan-si, 199.

G completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 19, 2009 with respect to the 183 square meters of Seosan-si, Seosan-si.

Defendant C, including the divorce between Defendant C and B, continued verbal abuse and assault to Defendant C during the marriage period, and brought a lawsuit of divorce and consolation money to the Daejeon Family Court for the reason that C had abused or abused it to Defendant C in the state of seeing his children, and that C had exercised violent language or violent violence (the Daejeon Family Court’s collegiate Family Court Branch Decision 2015ddan556).