The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant's act of mistake of facts is not a death of the victim because there is no assault against the victim's face.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal in this part.

The lower court determined that the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment can be fully recognized in full view of the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court under the title of “determination on the argument of the accused and the defense counsel.”

In comparison with the above judgment of the court below, a thorough examination is conducted by comparing the above judgment of the court below with the records, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below can be sufficiently recognized as the credibility of the witness H and I statement, and the defendant can be recognized as the facts leading to the death by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below. Thus, the judgment of the

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

① 피고인과 피해자의 다툼을 목격한 입원 환자 H는 수사 단계에서 원심에 이르기까지 ‘피고인이 피해자를 병실 안쪽으로 밀어 넘어뜨렸고 피해자의 머리가 바닥에 부딪히면서 쿵 소리가 났다. 피고인은 피해자의 배 위에 올라타 주먹으로 머리 부분을 2회 때렸고, 자신은 병실로 들어가 그만하라고 하면서 피고인을 말렸다’라는 취지로 구체적이고 일관되게 진술하였고, 그 진술은 CCTV 영상과도 대체로 일치한다.

In addition, the autopsy report also seems to be on the right side of the victim's right side, and at the time of this case, H's defendant was at one time at the time of this case.