logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.08.14 2018고단1238
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) got a long siren from Hanyang, Inc., Ltd., for a long time; and (b) caused an accident while driving the said siren while under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license on December 10, 2016; and (c) filed an application for payment order to order compensation for siren damage on or around December 26, 2016, the Defendant had the intent to file a complaint with an investigation agency as false even though the agreement on the lease of a motor vehicle under the name of the complainant was not forged at the time of filing an application for payment order, which was accompanied by the Defendant’s request for the aforementioned lawsuit, was not forged.

1. On June 26, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement of complaint to the effect that “F, who is an employee of Hanyang-si, Co., Ltd., Ltd., forged the car rental agreement and submitted a forged car rental agreement to the Defendant on June 24, 2016,” at a trade name in the vicinity of the Gwangju-dong District Public Prosecutor’s Office, 7-12, the compliance officer of Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-dong Office.”

However, in fact, the above car rental contract was not forged by stating the name of the defendant directly and signing.

Nevertheless, the defendant had E submit a written complaint to the public prosecutor's office of Gwangju District on the same day.

As a result, the defendant made F a false accusation for the purpose of having F punished criminal punishment.

2. On August 24, 2017, the Defendant made a false complaint to the effect that “E was subject to a complaint, such as F No. 1, and submitted to the police in charge of the investigation of the instant case by forging a motor vehicle rental agreement on June 24, 2016 to conceal such forgery.”

However, in fact, the above car rental contract is directly owned by the defendant.

arrow