logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.04.10 2013가합9193
손해배상 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(b)the scope of services to be carried out by “B” shall be as follows:

2. Establishment of Class 2 district unit planning. Article 6 (Prohibition of Substitutes)

1.The time of and the amount of payments for service costs are as follows:

Article 12 (Other Completion) "A" of the VT 60,000 VT x 25% x 165,000,000 x 165,00,000 x 25% x65% x65,000,000 x x 50% x x 330,000 x x x 100% x 60,000 x 660,000 x 00 x 00 x x 000 x x x x 12 (T) x in the course of performing the service of "B", if services are to be terminated in the middle due to any other reason not attributable to "B" in the course of performing the service of "B", "B" shall be paid in consultation with "B" up to the time of suspension.

2) Meanwhile, at the time of entering into the instant service contract, the Plaintiff and the Defendant shall enter into the instant service contract with the following special terms and conditions (hereinafter “instant special agreement”).

(1) The scope of the “standard technical service contract” in this context is to be determined and publicly announced by the district unit planning, which includes the agreement between A and B. (1) The date of receiving the island administrative agency: By February 24, 2012 (the scheduled date of completion of the determination and public notification: June 30, 2012).

2. The first installment of the cost of services: 10 million won, the second installment on December 22, 201: 50 million won, the third installment on the receipt date of island administrative agencies: within 150 million won and 45 million won after the determination and public notice of the price of services.

C. On April 17, 2012, the Plaintiff ordered the Defendant to suspend the service duty, and the service payment that the Plaintiff paid to the Defendant by the time is KRW 150,00,000.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant established a Class 2 district unit plan of either a specific type or a specific distribution type, and the district unit plan is determined and published within six months.

arrow