logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.29 2016노425
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the fact that the second floor of the building in Jeju City C (hereinafter “the building in this case”) is being operated as a sexual traffic business establishment can be fully recognized by the Defendant, knowing that the second floor of the building in Jeju City (hereinafter “the building in this case”), was provided to E.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the owner of the instant building, who leased the second floor of the instant building from the Defendant.

D In the second floor of the instant building, even though it was aware that the second floor of the instant building was in operation as a sexual traffic intermediary around May 19, 2014, and that the second floor of the instant building was in operation as a sexual traffic intermediary, the instant building provided the second floor of the instant building, which was acquired by the said D from the said D, for the said E to continue to operate the said a sexual traffic store at the same place as around August 27, 2015.

B. The lower court determined as follows: (a) around March 28, 2014, the Defendant leased the second floor of the instant building to D; (b) D, while operating “F” on the second floor of the instant building from May 1, 2014 to May 19, 2014; (c) the Jeju Local Police Agency sent a notice to the Defendant, the owner of the second floor of the instant building, that the second floor of the instant building was controlling commercial business; and (d) around October 27, 2014, the Defendant newly operated the instant building, which was provided to the Defendant on May 19, 2014; and (e) on October 28, 2014, the Defendant became aware of the fact that the second floor of the instant building was operated by the Korea National Police Agency that the second floor of the instant building was located in the second floor of the instant building; and (e) on May 19, 2014, the Defendant became aware of the fact that the second floor of the instant building was operated by the Korea National Police Agency.

arrow