Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won, respectively.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B are persons in a de facto marital relationship.

Defendant

around April 2013, A and B leased the second floor of the building located in Sinnam-gun (hereinafter “instant commercial sex acts business establishment”) from Defendant C to July 2016, and operated a marina business establishment with the trade name “E”. A and B transferred the lessee’s status to Defendant F from August 2016 to April 2017, and thereafter had operated the instant commercial sex acts business establishment again from May 2017.

1. On May 2017, Defendant A and Defendant B, as the owner of a business establishment of the instant sexual traffic, had overall control over the management of funds and employees, and Defendant B, as the manager of the instant sexual traffic business establishment during the instant period of time during which Defendant A was easy to run the instant sexual traffic business establishment by managing the instant sexual traffic business establishment.

In accordance with the above mother’s terms, the Defendants were engaged in the same year from May 2017.

7. Until the time of July, 17, by having six guest rooms, two shower rooms, two shower rooms, and two shower rooms, and having other female employees find out their places, and allowing them to engage in similar sexual intercourse in such a way as to see the sexual organ of unspecified male customers by hand, and as a result, receive KRW 120,000 per man from unspecified male customers.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Around January 2014, Defendant C was served with a notice from the police station stating that “the instant sexual traffic business establishment was provided as a place for sexual traffic in the middle of November 2013” at the Defendant’s residence located in the third floor of the building where the instant sexual traffic business establishment is located.

Nevertheless, the Defendant continued to operate the instant sexual traffic business establishment from August 2016 to July 2016 without closing the lease relationship with the said A, and the lessee’s status from August 2016 to April 2017.