Plaintiff (Attorney Lee Ho-ro et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Korea

September 2, 2008

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2004Guhap24981 Decided March 19, 2008

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

The judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall pay to each of the designated parties listed in the attached Form 1 list the amount entered in the attached Form 2 retirement pension list and the interest rate of 20% per annum from the next day of service of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of full payment.

The reasoning of this Court's ruling is as follows: (a) each "paragraph (5) Item (3) of the third and fourth and sixth "Article 21(5)3" is the same as the entry of the first court's ruling, except that each "Article 21(5)3" is used; (b) Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment Selection List and List of Unpaid Retirement Pension]

Judges Jeong Ji-hee (Presiding Judge)