logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.01.11 2016가단21322
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the two floors of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the indication of the attached sheet A, B, C, D, and A shall be as follows.

Reasons

On February 17, 2015, when adding the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence 1 through 3, the plaintiff acquired the object of the lease in this case from the plaintiff on February 18, 2015 and was in possession and use until now, and the defendant legally appropriated the lease deposit amount of KRW 5,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 400,000, monthly rent of KRW 400,000, and monthly rent of KRW 35,000, which is recognized by the plaintiff on June 30, 2016, the lease contract of this case was lawfully extended to 0,000,000 from April 7, 2015 to June 30, 2016.

Therefore, the Defendant should deliver the leased object of this case to the Plaintiff, and if the Plaintiff appropriated the rent of KRW 5,00,000 as the monthly rent in arrears from July 19, 2015, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the unjust enrichment that accrues from the rate of KRW 435,00 per month from July 2, 2016 to July 3, 2016.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are groundless.

arrow