1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Acknowledgement of the first instance judgment

A. The reasons why the court stated in this case are as follows.

Except for amendments to the judgment of the first instance as prescribed in paragraph (1), the same shall apply to the judgment of the first instance.

The relevant portion shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. No. 7 of the first instance judgment, No. 15 and 16 of the first instance court’s “the result of the appraiser’s appraisal of medical records, this court’s “the result of the appraiser’s appraisal of medical records,” and “the result of the witness’s testimony at the court of the first instance, the result of the appraiser’s appraisal of medical records at the court of the first instance, and the court of the first instance,” respectively.

3) On the 8th page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the witness of the court of first instance (“this court”)’s testimony, and the court of first instance (“G”) Nos. 9 and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance (“G” also supported the operation of the ice by other helicopters, other than the helicopter operated by the deceased, on five occasions, performing a ice ice support flight.” The “Sk’s ice ice ice support flight” was mainly conducted by the witness of the court of first instance, other than the deceased, and the “Sk’s ice ice ice support flight” in the work of “G,” and the deceased appears to have not complained of any particular difficulties surrounding the event.”

6) On the 9th page 10 and 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following parts of the judgment are added. ① The instant company only recommended the deceased to operate a multi-aircraft, and did not expect the deceased to take personnel or economic disadvantageous measures on the ground that the deceased failed to pass the examination of his ability to operate a multi-aircraft.

A person shall be appointed.

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of justifiable grounds.