logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.12 2016고단4123
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,00,000,00,00 for six months of imprisonment for Defendant B.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of the business of manufacturing plastic packaging paper in Mosung City, and the defendant A is the representative director of the above company.

1. The defendant A shall not employ any foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the defendant from February 23, 2016 to the same year.

4. Until October 20, a corporation employed 10,000 won per month to 10,000 won, including Thailand nationality D, who did not have the status of stay eligible for employment as shown in the list of offenses in the attached Form B, and employed foreigners who did not have the status of stay eligible for employment by having them pack plastic products, etc.

2. A, the representative director of Defendant B’s Defendant Company, employed a foreigner who does not have the above status of sojourn for employment as to the Defendant’s business at the same time, place, and place as Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each statement;

1. A list of illegal employment foreigners, inquiry into foreigners in short-term stay, and full certificate of registration;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act; Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the same Act; Article 18 (3) of the same Act; Article 99-3 subparagraph 2 of the same Act; Articles 94 subparagraph 9 and 18 (3) of the same Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: The sentence shall be imposed as ordered in consideration of the details of the crime committed by the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the number and employment period of foreign workers employed by the Defendants, the degree of reflectivity of Defendant A, and the previous conviction relation (which had the record of being punished by a fine for the same kind of crime around January 2013), and all the other conditions of sentencing specified in records and arguments.

arrow