Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of CCA110 Obane.

On March 22, 2017, around 16:20 on March 22, 2017, the Defendant, at the intersection in front of the Suwon-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, proceeding one lane at the speed of the shock market at the intersection in front of the hydro-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu.

At the same time, there was an individual taxi who was in a direct line to the right side of the passage direction at that time, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to drive after checking the safety according to the signals by reducing speed and checking well the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in violating signal signals to red light and was driving by the victim D(69) who was directly engaged in an unresheded apartment from the right side of the Madro-cream to the Madro-type apartment by negligence, and was driving by the victim D(69).

EM5 Taxies received the front part of the EM5 si from the right side of the above Oba.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the above victim suffered from the injury of cryp finites, etc. in need of treatment for about three weeks to the victim F (21) who is a taxi passenger, and the injury of cryp finites in need of treatment for about two weeks to the victim G (25 years) who is a taxi passenger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D, G, and F;

1. Police investigation report (inspection of accident scene, etc.);

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis and written confirmation of medical treatment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph and a taxi boom image to the extent that it is possible to detect the accident;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the reason for the order of provisional payment.