logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울지방법원 2003. 2. 4. 선고 2002고단6393 판결
[건축법위반][미간행]
Escopics

Defendant 1 and one other

Prosecutor

34 64

Defense Counsel

Attorney Lee In-bok et al.

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 900,000.

If the defendants fail to pay each of the above fines, the defendants shall be confined in the old house for the period calculated by converting each of the 40,000 won into one day: Provided, That the fractional amount shall be one day.

Criminal facts

Defendant 1, as the head of the association of the 20th above ground in Seoul (detailed address omitted), the head of the association of the 7th above ground floor (title omitted), and the representative director of the (mutual omission) development corporation, Defendant 2, who is the contractor of the said construction. Although Defendant 1 changed the design with the content that the height of the building should be lowered from 7.84 to 67.45 meters by compulsory conciliation and partly changed the purpose of use on each floor through the court, Defendant 1 continued to carry out the said officetels construction without obtaining permission from the competent authorities from February 1, 2002 to April 1 of the same year.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal testimony by the Nonindicted Witness

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Statement of the police statement of the Nonindicted Party

1. A complaint, a copy of field photograph, a copy of a civil petition treatment meeting, an application for permission for construction, and a copy of permission;

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Articles 79(2) and 10(1) of each Building Act

1. Invitation of a workhouse;

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Code

Judge Final Judgment A

arrow