1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,49,792 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from October 1, 2013 to December 23, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 22:00 on October 1, 2013, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as ground that the Plaintiff was assaulted by the Defendant on the ground that, at the packaging horse in front of the 93 upper dong post office, the Defendant et al. al. al., the Plaintiff was fluent and fluored by assaulting the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff was acting in a manner that he did not go against the Defendant and did not do so.

(hereinafter “instant injury”). (b)

On August 21, 2014, the Defendant was indicted for the injury of the instant case at the Suwon District Court Ansan Branch No. 2014dan435 (Bodily Injury), and was sentenced to a judgment of conviction of two years of suspended execution on August 21, 2014, and the said judgment was finalized on August 29, 2014.

[Judgment of the court below] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the fact of recognition as above, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the injury of this case.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. 1) Active Damage 1: future medical expenses: KRW 1,955,738 (the cost of surgery to remove solid waste in metal inserted in the dub aggregate) 3) the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion, based on the results of the appraiser C’s physical appraisal of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff needs to open an ordinary adult male and female for 7 days during the period of hospitalization.

In addition, since the plaintiff needs to open 16 hours per day (24 hours - 8 hours per day), there was a need to open 2 adults per day and 8 hours per person.

Therefore, the plaintiff suffered losses from the opening of the king of 1,175,650 won in total (83,975 won in urban ordinary wage in the second half of 2013 x 2 x 7 days).

B. (1) The victim caused the aftermath disability due to the accident that led to the need to protect the victim.

In order to claim for the opening costs until the closing of the trial court proceedings, the expenses was actually paid or the opening costs was not actually paid.

Even if the victim's parent or spouse is involved, the victim's parent or spouse.