The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal - In light of the defendant's partial statement of misunderstanding of facts, the victim T's initial statement, U's statement, etc., the fact that the defendant committed assault against the victim together with the defendant's behaviors is sufficiently recognized.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted all the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

B. 1) The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) C and D were in the main point of “F” located in Sungnam-si E located in Sungnam-si; (b) the victim G (19 years of age)’s female-friendly job offer H and their conduct, and they were in fighting between the victim G and their conduct.

C, D, and the Defendant et al. who heard and fighting match so that they were satisfyed with C on January 1, 2015 at the front of the national bank located in the new interest-dong market at the same time on January 1, 2015, and C satisfyed with the victim G and the Defendant et al., following their daily activities.

B and K are re-camping expenses, and J and K are flabing the breath of the victim G, and K was flabing the victim G due to flab, and the victim G is flabing off to K once, and the victim I, who is a part of the victim G, is flabing the blabing of the victim G, "blabing the blab".

In the context of "K, K Ma L L L L L L L h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.