1. The Defendant: 126,752,760 won to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from August 13, 2013 to June 12, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant entered into an industrial (A) agreement with the Plaintiff on June 21, 2006 and received electricity from the Plaintiff around that time in order to be supplied with electricity necessary for building fishery products while operating fishery products processing business chain B.

Upon the application of the Defendant, the Plaintiff expanded the contractual power to the Defendant, the industrial (A) of June 21, 2007, the lower pressure of 74KW, and the industrial (A) of July 5, 2010, respectively, to the lower pressure of 99KW.

The name of the applicant in compliance with the purpose of agricultural use: The purpose of agricultural use(s) for agricultural use(s) for each type of contract: The destroyed electric power: 70KW, which the applicant has promised to use electricity for each type of contract and for the purpose of use applied for in the new application for the electric use to your company, and if it is proved through on-site confirmation that he voluntarily uses electricity in violation of any other contract type or for any other purpose, he will not raise an objection even if he/she handles the violation of Article 44(1) of the terms and conditions of the electricity supply (request for penalty of five times and changes by contract type) in accordance with Article 44(1)

In addition, Chapter 3 of the new work process guidelines is 10.b.

In accordance with the standards for the application of the electricity on the use of agricultural and fishery products to customers, etc., it is necessary to build or process agricultural and fishery products produced by him/her, and if he/she purchases or entrusts another person with the construction of agricultural and fishery products, he/she may raise

B. On June 11, 201, D, an electrical construction company C, filed an application with the Plaintiff for the use of electricity in high voltage 700K on behalf of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff, via D, notified the Defendant through D that only if the Defendant directly produces and builds fishery products, the Defendant may supply the agricultural power, and issued a written statement from the Defendant as follows. From August 23, 201, from August 23, 201, the Defendant was divided into the agricultural use (A), the agricultural use (B), and the agricultural use (A) and the agricultural use (B).

2.Terms and conditions of electricity;