1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around August 2, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into an electricity use contract with the Defendant with the following terms and conditions. Around August 2, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into an electricity use contract with the Defendant. - The meaning of distinguishing the types of electricity rates based on the usage, etc. of electricity by type of contract (see Article 3 subparag. 8 of the Enforcement Rule 3 of the instant case cited in the rear and rear): Farm (A) contract power: 2,50kW - supply method: 3 upper 4 lines (2.9kV): contract facilities - contract facilities: 2,50kVA - contract facilities for matters not specified in the contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant terms and conditions”).

- The terms and conditions of the instant contract, irrespective of the terms and conditions of the contract, are amended. - In the event that the terms and conditions of the instant contract are modified, they would be at the risk of complying with the revised terms and conditions of the instant contract. 2,200kW 180kW 120kW 120k high pressureA industrial (A) high pressureA high-level customer contract power for each type of contract for the use of the Defendant’s fishery products for each type of contract (2,500kW - 180kW - 120kW = 2,200kW - 2,200kW : the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the method of calculating customer contract power for the joint use with the Defendant on the same day as the following terms and conditions:

- Upon the change of the representative customer and the customer, I notify the Plaintiff of the details of the change and conclude the electric utility contract with the Plaintiff.

- Matters not specified in this Agreement shall be governed by the terms and conditions of this case, the same Enforcement Rule (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulations”), and the new guidelines for dealing with business affairs, and if there is an objection to the interpretation, it shall be decided through mutual consultation.

3) On October 2012, the Plaintiff’s D branch office is an industrial power (B) from November 1, 2012 to the Defendant on which the customer’s type of contract, which had been subject to agricultural-use power (B/C) during the contract period of at least 1,00 kW due to the structural reorganization of the contract for agricultural-use electric charges, is changed from November 1, 2012 to B.