logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.10.05 2018고합183
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2018, the Defendant was a person who was born as a candidate of C Party in the 7th election district of a member of the North Korean National Assembly, which was implemented on June 13, 2018.

No person shall publish false facts (where he/she inserts any academic background, it shall not include any false facts other than the regular academic background and other academic background completed in a foreign educational course equivalent thereto) with respect to an organization, etc. to which he/she belongs, such as the birth, status, occupation, career, etc. of a candidate, in favor of a candidate (including a person who intends to become a candidate) or possess a false propaganda document in favor of a candidate by means of a speech, broadcast, communication, poster,

1. The Defendant distributed name cards from April 10, 2018.

5. Until March 5, 200, a total of 3,821 c,821 c, stating the career of “the present DoE Audit”, was distributed to the election district residents.

However, in fact, the defendant was under the audit of the preceding F organization and was not under the audit of the former F organization, and only was under the audit of the G organization, and was not under the audit of the current E organization.

As a result, the defendant published false facts about career in favor of the defendant who wishes to be a candidate for the purpose of election.

2. On April 17, 2018, the Defendant distributed news report materials: (a) opened a press room in the B military office’s bryping room on April 17, 2018; and (b) reported materials stating, “The Defendant shall make every effort to interfere with the creation of agricultural income through the creation of good ideas, such as linking agriculture by taking into account the experience in the patent application for 40 recommendations.”

H Distribution to 6-7 reporters, such as reporters, was made to report to local media such as I on the same day.

However, the defendant only applied for 21 patents, and there was no application for 40 patents.

As a result, the defendant published false facts about career in favor of the defendant who wishes to be a candidate for the purpose of election.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;

arrow