logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 08. 22. 선고 2013두10205 판결
(심리불속행) 8년 이상 농지를 직접 경작한 것으로 인정할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu32149 (Seoul High Court 2013.04.11)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 201st century 4736 ( December 26, 2011)

Title

(C) No person shall be deemed to have cultivated farmland directly for at least eight years.

Summary

It is difficult to recognize that farmland has been cultivated directly for 8 years or longer in light of the fact that the corporation works as the representative director of the corporation, obtains high-amount earned income, fails to submit objective data on the purchase costs of farming materials or the disposal details of agricultural products, and that the farmland had been cultivated by a third party before the plaintiff acquired farmland by leasing and cultivating farmland.

Cases

2013Du10205 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

The AA

Defendant-Appellee

Director of the District Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu32149 Decided April 11, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

August 22, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment of the court below, the appellate brief, and the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Appellate Procedure, or are recognized to be groundless, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow