The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant and the injured party B (22 years, 20 years, 10 years) are pro-Japanese.

1. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant, at the smoking room near the Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, intended to introduce female-friendly implements to the victim, and committed an indecent act by force, as it rhys the left side of the victim’s hand, with the victim’s own hand.

2. On March 1, 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the following parts of the “F Lestop”, which is located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon Seo-gu E, Daejeon, by leaving the victim’s left side, making drinking and drinking with one’s own hand, and using the victim’s left side buckbucks.

3. On March 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim by inserting his/her own knife and inserting his/her knife, while around 21:00 to 22:00, around Daejeon Pungdong, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim, by inserting his/her knife and inserting his/her knife under the victim’s knife, seated next seated.

4. 피고인은 2017. 3. 말 24:00 경 대전 유성구 G에 있는 ‘H’ 술집에서, 술을 마시던 중 갑자기 엄지손가락과 검지 손가락으로 피해자의 귓불을 만져 강제로 추행하였다.

2. There is a record of statements made by the victim's investigative agency and court as evidence supporting the above facts charged and the statement that the defendant seems to have acknowledged the indecent act.

However, in full view of the contents of the above recording, the defendant recognized the indecent act against the victim.

It is difficult to recognize it.

In light of the Defendant’s statement, the contents of I dialogue between the Defendant and the victim, the video and the contents of conversations, etc., even if all the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor is compiled, the above facts charged were proven beyond reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, each of the facts charged of this case constitutes a case where there is no proof of facts constituting a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act. In addition, Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act is applicable.