1. The Defendant’s trade of the motor vehicles indicated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff is limited to that of the motor vehicle indicated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff on December 10, 2015.

1. The Defendant’s purchase of KRW 2,00,00 from C on December 10, 2015 by the Plaintiff’s agent for the Plaintiff of KRW 2,00,00 is either a dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings. Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to take over from the Plaintiff the transfer of ownership registration procedure for the instant motor vehicle on the ground of sale as of December 10, 2015.

2. As to the determination of the defense, the defendant asserted that the transfer registration procedure cannot be accepted until the attachment registration, etc. completed on the instant vehicle is cancelled, but there is no evidence to prove that the defendant agreed with the plaintiff to take over the transfer registration procedure by prior implementation or simultaneous implementation with the cancellation of the attachment registration, etc.

Ultimately, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim is reasonable and it is so decided as per Disposition.