1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a doctor who operates the Sungsung division (hereinafter “the instant hospital”), and the Plaintiff is a person who solely succeeds the deceased as a child of the network D (hereinafter “the deceased”).

B. On April 22, 2015 and July 14, 2015, the Deceased visited the instant hospital on two occasions, and received consultation on the extension of the period of surgery. On July 20, 2015, the Deceased received an expansion surgery using the substance from the Defendant under the general anesthesia (hereinafter “instant surgery”) on July 20, 2015.

C. After July 22, 2015, the Deceased visited the instant hospital and received removal and disinfection treatment, and on July 25, 2015, the Deceased visited the instant hospital to take measures for removal and disinfection of the shots.

On July 28, 2015, the Deceased complained of the symptoms of decline caused by snow history, Gutotory, and high heat, and the hospital was in the emergency room of the hospital. As a result of blood examination on the Deceased, the hospital took measures to transfer the deceased to the hospital at the Jeonnam University on the same day, around 23:55 on the same day.

E. On July 29, 2015, the Deceased arrived at the Jeonnam University Hospital on July 00:16, 2015, and the Jeonnam University Hospital performed a chest computerized short-design shooting in order to find out the cause of infections suspected of having proved the infections as a result of blood tests, etc., and as a result of shooting, when the body fluid storage and air condition was verified on both sides of the operation, the Deceased performed an operation to remove both sides of the relevant body, taking into account the possibility of infections on both sides at around 12:40 on the same day.

F. The Deceased died on July 30, 2015, on the following day, on the ground of a parodial certificate around 11:41.

[Reasons for Recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 8, Gap evidence 9, Gap evidence 10-3, Eul evidence 10-1 through 3, the E hospital of this court, and the results of fact inquiry into Jeonnam University Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Defendant violated the Defendant’s medical care duty, ① surgery on the deceased prior to the instant veterinary surgery.