1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit.

1. The Defendant asserted by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) did not pay the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) an amount equivalent to the amount stated in the purport of the claim, from March 2014 to May 2014. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiffs each amount stated in the purport of the claim, which is the wage payable, to the Plaintiffs.

2. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each statement in the evidence No. 4-1 to No. 4-9, the plaintiffs prepared a "written request for cooperative expenses deduction" with the purport that the plaintiffs deducted 1.5% of the total amount of salaries monthly from wages on May 28, 2013 (Appointed G only G, September 10, 2013) and request the plaintiffs to deposit into the "The Incheon Branch of the Democratic Bus Traffic Union Incheon Branch of the National Transport Industry Union" to which the plaintiffs belong. In this case, the amount of wages equivalent to the union expenses for which the plaintiffs seek payment was transferred to the "National Transport Industry Democratic Bus Traffic Association Incheon Branch of the National Transport Industry Union."

Therefore, it is difficult to view that there is a right to claim the payment of wages equivalent to the above partnership fees to the plaintiffs, apart from the fact that the above Telecommunication Association claims the defendant, the plaintiff (Appointed Party)'s above assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair in conclusion, and it is so revoked the judgment of the court of first instance and dismissed the plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim. It is so decided as per Disposition.