logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2021.02.16 2020고단1301
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 9, 2020, the Defendants committed the joint crime of the Defendants: (a) at the entrance of “D” shop in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) the victim E ( South, 27 years old); and (c) the victim E (the victim South, 28 years old); (d) the victim F (the victim South, 28 years old); and (e) the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son, and the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s k.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim H such as a shoulder, tension, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim G on the climatic and frodal base in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and assaulted the victim E and F.

2. On October 9, 2020, Defendant B, at around 00:48, tried to arrest Defendant B, who was dispatched with the report of the assault case prior to the above “D”, and attempted to board the patrol vehicle after arresting Defendant B, who was on the duty of the police station 112, who was called out, and attempted to get off the patrol vehicle after arresting Defendant B, who was on the duty of the police station 112, who was on the duty of the police station 1, and the patrol vehicle. The above J prevented Defendant B from carrying out the duty of the police station 20:0,000, tried to get off the patrol vehicle after holding the back of the patrol vehicle at the next time; while putting the Defendant at a bath, the chest of J’s chest was pushed down one time with both hand, and assaulted the right side of J with the left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to the F, E, G, H, and J;

1. A report on internal investigation (referring to attaching, etc. photographs of damage), victim's photograph;

1. A report on internal investigation (referring to damage situations);

arrow