beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive against Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B are legally married.
1. On October 6, 2018, Defendant A, a single criminal defendant, was under the influence of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the road front of the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Gun Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Gun Do Do Gun Gun Do Do Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun
At around 00:50 on the following day, the Defendant continued to drive the G District H and the G District I's demand for stop, which was called at the entrance of the F apartment in Busan, to be a substitute driver's report.
A slopeH and the Inspector I used a drinking-free motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle driven by the Defendant as a driver of the motor vehicle above the patrol lane, and requested the Defendant to take a respiratory test as a drinking-free place, but continued to refuse it, and requested the Defendant to comply with a drinking-free test by inserting approximately 25 minutes from around 01:20 of the same day to the G District located in the same J from around 01:20 of the same day, but did not comply with the police officer’s request for a drinking-free test without justifiable grounds.
2. At around 00:52 on October 7, 2018, the Defendants committed assault, such as: (a) Defendant A, who refused to take a alcohol level as stated in the above paragraph (1) and was arrested as a flagrant offender by slope H; and (b) Defendant B, who was accompanied by the couple, was tightly sealed by the two descendants, and was tightly sealed by the parts, such as H, once by drinking; (c) Defendant B, in combination with the above, committed assault, such as 4 times the parts of the H’s face, and twice the face part.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit violence to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the duty of regulating drinking driving.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement 1.