logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.11 2014가단10882
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A reported marriage with C, and Plaintiff B, who will enter middle school year around March 3, 2014, following the date of the next case, are children, and Plaintiff B scheduled to enter middle school year.

B. On February 19, 2014, I demanded a divorce against H, one’s husband, and demanded the Plaintiff to pay consolation money, etc., and filed a lawsuit for divorce and consolation money, etc. with the Daejeon Family Court 2014da1351, the Daejeon Family Court reported 112 to confirm the field of communication at the police station, along with Defendant D, E, and I’s mother, Defendant F, G, etc., who is one of the births of I, and entered on February 19, 2014, under the pretext that I’s apartment, police dispatched, and confirmation of “competing” should be conducted on behalf of the Plaintiffs’ dwelling, and at the same time, H was located in the Plaintiffs’ house.

C. Since February 26, 2014, Plaintiff A was under medical treatment with acute stress reaction caused by the instant case after February 22, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 20 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion;

A. The plaintiffs' assertion (1) I and the defendants' family members who are the plaintiffs' claims are illegal, without prejudice to the plaintiff A, and the plaintiffs' house was invaded without permission, and the plaintiff A's eviction needs to be removed.

In response to the Gu, it did not comply with the Gu, and illegally photographs the plaintiffs' house and face with screen pictures and photographs.

Plaintiff

A was mistaken for a crime of adultery without any error, and the Plaintiff B was made a sense of shame and insult by being mistaken for a crime of adultery, and due to the conduct by the Plaintiff I and the Defendants, which came into his own possession, and her mother was boomed as a simple passage, and was made a sense of shame and insult by affixing his/her photograph on the house.

This constitutes a tort by the Defendants, and the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay consolation money and medical expenses to the Plaintiffs as damages therefrom.

(2) As I or the Defendants, and their behaviors were destroyed by the Plaintiff’s stample door by generating the Plaintiff’s stample.

arrow