logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.07.26 2013고단732
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 19, 2013, at around 06:15, the Defendant driven Cbenz’s car under the influence of alcohol with approximately KRW 2.78 meters alcohol concentration of 0.203% from the section of approximately 2.78km to the front crosswalk of “drout air equipment” located in the same Gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, to drive a cenz car with the influence of alcohol content of 0.203%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing)

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with 0.203% of the blood alcohol concentration, driven the above vehicle at a crosswalk in the Seogu-gu Scattering-dong, Daegu-gu, as stated in paragraph (1), led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle at a speed that is impossible to know in the direction of the NNN distance from the direction of the northwest-gu.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph after checking whether he/she is a person to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not discover the victim D(56) who crosses the above crosswalk according to the foregoing pedestrian signal by negligence without knowing that the vehicle progress signal is changed to a stop signal, while neglecting this, and did not discover the victim D(56). The Defendant got the victim on the left-hand side of the above vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a state where it is difficult to drive the car normally due to the influence of drinking, received approximately 14 weeks of treatment from the victim, and went away without taking necessary measures such as saving the victim by stopping it immediately.

(i) the evidence;

arrow