A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2007, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of one million won by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court (hereinafter referred to as the "Monk Driving"), and on December 16, 201, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of two million won by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Monk Driving").

(Criminal Facts)

1. On January 18, 2014, at around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) driven a Cchip car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 700 meters from a section of about 700 meters from the front of the friwon-dong, Seogu, Daegu to the front of the friwon-dong located in Seogu, Seogu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, to the road.

As a result, the defendant was punished as a drinking driving more than twice, and again was driving under the influence of alcohol.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (non-accidentd measures) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles of the franchiseer;

When the Defendant, at the time and time as stated in paragraph (1), drives a free-to-land car and reduced drinking on the front of the Daegu Western Police Station, a police officer belonging to the traffic safety department of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station, who was working in the direction of the traffic safety department of the pedestrian crossing in front of the Daegu Seo-gu Scattering-dong, leaving the road front of the Daegu Seo-gu Gun Police Station, in order to avoid the crackdown, and proceeding the road front of the Daegu Seo-gu 59-ro, Northwest-do Office,

Alleys were made bypass to alleys.

At the time, in such a case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take care of the front, rear and left well and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, has entered a right-way bypassing the runway as it is.

In the opposite part, the victim D(51) who was stopped while stopping is front of the EM 520 car in driving.