Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the E- 106 management office where the victim D in Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, is a management engineer; and (b) on the ground that broadcasting management office is flick, the Defendant’s business interfered with the Defendant’s business is the flicker for human beings who do not need to do so.

Cr. Sheba far farb

The victim interfered with the management of the apartment facilities of the victim by force for about 20 minutes by avoiding disturbances, such as leaving the victim's bucks by sucking the part of the victim's bucks, leaving the bucks on the strings, leaving the strings on the strings.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same place as around 13:40 on December 9, 2017, at around 13:40, and at the same time as paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant was subject to the removal from the police officer G belonging to the F District Unit of the F District of Busan, which was called upon 112 reports, and “packers are equally fested,” and “packers are close to taxes.”

C. In doing so, G’s shoulder flab, the flab was assaulted by her hand by opening the shoulder flab to the extent of quality, thereby hindering police officers’ legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made in relation to H, I, and G;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. CCTV CDs (the Defendant and his defense counsel did not constitute a crime of interference with business because the Defendant did not assault the victim D or expressed his/her desire to employees to the management office, and accordingly, the police officers dispatched failed to meet the requirements for the arrest of flagrant offenders attempted to force the Defendant, and thus, the Defendant was forced to take the seat of police officers G in the course of setting up against it, and the police officers did not take a bath during that process, and thus, the crime of interference with the performance of official duties is not established.

As such, comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant was weak from around 13:16 on December 9, 2017 to around 13:25 on the management office of this case.